Even faster data loading with PostgreSQL 14? wal_level=none

PostgreSQL is already very fast with loading loading large amounts of data. You can follow this post to get some recommendations for loading data as fast as possible. In addition you can create unlogged tables, but this on the table level and not the whole cluster. With this patch there will be another option: wal_level=none. With this, only minimal WAL is written, but of course at the cost of losing durability. If the cluster crashes in that mode, the whole cluster is corrupted and can not anymore be started. If you accept that risks, this can be something for you, especially when do data warehousing and load time is one of the most important factors.

To have a baseline to start with lets create a simple file we’ll use for loading a table:

postgres=# create table t1 ( a int, b text, c date );
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into t1 select x, md5(x::text), now() from generate_series(1,6000000) x;
INSERT 0 6000000
postgres=# copy t1 to '/var/tmp/demo.txt';
COPY 6000000
postgres=# \! ls -lha /var/tmp/demo.txt
-rw-r--r--. 1 postgres postgres 297M Nov 23 15:51 /var/tmp/demo.txt
postgres=# 

My current wal_level is replica, so lets change that to minimal:

postgres=# alter system set wal_level = minimal;
ALTER SYSTEM
postgres=# \! pg_ctl restart -m fast
waiting for server to shut down.... done
server stopped
waiting for server to start....2020-11-23 15:53:23.424 CET - 1 - 209537 -  - @ LOG:  redirecting log output to logging collector process
2020-11-23 15:53:23.424 CET - 2 - 209537 -  - @ HINT:  Future log output will appear in directory "pg_log".
 done
server started
postgres=# show wal_level;
FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded.
postgres=# show wal_level;
 wal_level 
-----------
 minimal
(1 row)

How long does it take to load that file into a new table with wal_level=minimal and how much WAL was generated?

postgres=# create table t2 ( like t1 );
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# \timing
Timing is on.
postgres=# select pg_current_wal_lsn();
 pg_current_wal_lsn 
--------------------
 0/39872628
(1 row)

Time: 0.757 ms
postgres=# copy t2 from '/var/tmp/demo.txt';
COPY 6000000
Time: 10008.335 ms (00:10.008)
postgres=# select pg_current_wal_lsn();
 pg_current_wal_lsn 
--------------------
 0/4C693DD8
(1 row)

Time: 0.857 ms
postgres=# select pg_wal_lsn_diff('0/4C693DD8','0/39872628');
 pg_wal_lsn_diff 
-----------------
       316807088
(1 row)
Time: 2.714 ms

The time is around 10 second and we have generated around 316MB of WAL. How does that change if we go with wal_level=none?

ALTER SYSTEM
Time: 28.625 ms
postgres=# \! pg_ctl restart -m fast
waiting for server to shut down.... done
server stopped
waiting for server to start....2020-11-23 16:00:25.648 CET - 1 - 209599 -  - @ LOG:  redirecting log output to logging collector process
2020-11-23 16:00:25.648 CET - 2 - 209599 -  - @ HINT:  Future log output will appear in directory "pg_log".
 done
server started
postgres=# show wal_level;
FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded.
Time: 21.286 ms
postgres=# show wal_level;
 wal_level 
-----------
 none
(1 row)

Time: 1.251 ms

Same test as above:

postgres=# create table t3 ( like t1 );
CREATE TABLE
Time: 44.676 ms
postgres=# select pg_current_wal_lsn();
 pg_current_wal_lsn 
--------------------
 0/4CA0A550
(1 row)

Time: 7.053 ms
postgres=# copy t3 from '/var/tmp/demo.txt';
COPY 6000000
Time: 7968.204 ms (00:07.968)
postgres=# select pg_current_wal_lsn();
 pg_current_wal_lsn 
--------------------
 0/4CA0A550
(1 row)

Time: 0.948 ms
postgres=# select pg_wal_lsn_diff('0/4CA0A550','0/4CA0A550');
 pg_wal_lsn_diff 
-----------------
               0
(1 row)

Time: 3.857 ms

We come down to 7 seconds and no WAL generated at all. That means faster loading and no space consumption in the pg_wal directory. Really nice, but be aware that the cluster gets corrupted when it crashes during loading:

postgres=# \! ps -ef | grep "postgres -D"
postgres  209599       1  0 16:00 ?        00:00:00 /u01/app/postgres/product/DEV/db_1/bin/postgres -D /u02/pgdata/DEV
postgres  209644  209534  0 16:04 pts/1    00:00:00 sh -c ps -ef | grep "postgres -D"
postgres  209646  209644  0 16:04 pts/1    00:00:00 grep postgres -D
postgres=# create table t4 ( like t1 );
CREATE TABLE
Time: 3.731 ms
postgres=# copy t4 from '/var/tmp/demo.txt';
COPY 6000000
Time: 8070.995 ms (00:08.071)

In another session kill the postmaster while the load is running:

postgres@centos8pg:/home/postgres/ [pgdev] kill -9 209599

If you try to restart the cluster afterwards this is the result:

2020-11-23 16:05:17.441 CET - 1 - 210089 -  - @ LOG:  database system was interrupted; last known up at 2020-11-23 16:00:25 CET
2020-11-23 16:05:17.441 CET - 2 - 210089 -  - @ FATAL:  detected an unexpected server shutdown when WAL logging was disabled
2020-11-23 16:05:17.441 CET - 3 - 210089 -  - @ HINT:  It looks like you need to deploy a new cluster from your full backup again.
2020-11-23 16:05:17.444 CET - 7 - 210087 -  - @ LOG:  startup process (PID 210089) exited with exit code 1
2020-11-23 16:05:17.444 CET - 8 - 210087 -  - @ LOG:  aborting startup due to startup process failure
2020-11-23 16:05:17.449 CET - 9 - 210087 -  - @ LOG:  database system is shut dow

If you can accept that, this can be a huge step to load data faster than it is possible now.

Cet article Even faster data loading with PostgreSQL 14? wal_level=none est apparu en premier sur Blog dbi services.